In short
- Short reads (Illumina) are accurate but give fragmented assemblies, because repeats longer than the reads can't be resolved.
- Long reads (Oxford Nanopore, PacBio) span repeats and can produce complete, circular chromosomes and plasmids.
- Hybrid assembly combines the accuracy of short reads with the structure from long reads.
- With Oxford Nanopore R10.4 chemistry, near-finished bacterial genomes are possible from long reads alone, without short-read polishing.
Why short-read assemblies are fragmented
An assembler rebuilds a genome by overlapping reads. When a sequence is repeated in several places, such as ribosomal RNA operons, insertion sequences or transposase genes, a read shorter than the repeat can't show which copy it came from. The assembler stops at each repeat, and the genome ends up in many pieces (contigs). Illumina reads are accurate but short, so they give accurate but fragmented assemblies. Long reads can produce complete assemblies but have historically been more error-prone [1].
Fragmentation matters most for the genes you often care about. Resistance genes, virulence genes and plasmids are frequently next to repeats and mobile elements, so they tend to land at the ends of contigs or get split between them.
The three strategies compared
| Strategy | Strengths | Limitations | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short reads only (Illumina) | High base accuracy, low cost per sample, easy to batch | Fragmented assembly; plasmids hard to separate from the chromosome | Species ID, AMR and virulence screening, large isolate collections |
| Long reads only (Nanopore, PacBio) | Spans repeats; complete chromosomes and plasmids | Needs high-molecular-weight DNA; older chemistries had more errors | Complete reference genomes, plasmid structure |
| Hybrid (short + long) | Complete structure with short-read accuracy | Two libraries per sample, higher cost | Reference genomes for publication, genetic context of AMR genes |
Assembly tools for each approach
SPAdes is a standard choice for short-read bacterial assembly [2]. Unicycler was built for hybrid data: it creates an assembly graph from short reads with SPAdes, then uses long reads to resolve the graph into complete replicons. In tests it produced larger contigs with fewer misassemblies than other hybrid assemblers, even when long-read depth and accuracy were low [1].
For long reads alone, Flye builds a repeat graph that represents repeated regions explicitly. It was faster than competing assemblers and gave better or comparable results [3]. Because every long-read assembler makes some errors, Trycycler combines several independent assemblies of the same genome into a consensus. In benchmarks this produced fewer errors than any single tool, and adding polishing gave the most accurate genomes in the study [4]. Trycycler needs some manual work, so it suits projects where a finished reference genome is the goal.
Long-read accuracy has improved quickly. With Oxford Nanopore R10.4 chemistry, Sereika and colleagues generated near-finished microbial genomes from isolates and metagenomes without short-read or reference polishing [5]. For many projects a long-read-only genome is now a realistic option.
Which strategy fits your question?
- Identifying species and screening many isolates for resistance or virulence genes: short reads are usually enough and cost the least per sample.
- Finding out whether a resistance gene is on a plasmid or in the chromosome: use long reads or a hybrid. See plasmids and mobile genetic elements.
- Publishing a complete reference genome or genome announcement: long-read or hybrid assembly, so each chromosome and plasmid is one circular sequence.
- Comparing many strains in a pangenome: short reads for most strains, ideally with a few complete genomes as references. See pangenome analysis.
Sending data to BacSeq Analytics
Short-read data are assembled with SPAdes as part of every package. If you have long-read or hybrid data, say so when you upload your files, so the assembly approach matches the data. Whatever the strategy, the assembly is checked for contiguity, completeness and contamination before analysis, as described in assembly quality metrics.
References
- Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(6):e1005595. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595
- Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi:10.1089/cmb.2012.0021
- Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:540–546. doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8
- Wick RR, Judd LM, Cerdeira LT, et al. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol. 2021;22:266. doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02483-z
- Sereika M, Kirkegaard RH, Karst SM, et al. Oxford Nanopore R10.4 long-read sequencing enables the generation of near-finished bacterial genomes from pure cultures and metagenomes without short-read or reference polishing. Nat Methods. 2022;19:823–826. doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01539-7